In a recent interview, “Killers of the Flower Moon” star Lily Gladstone went for a cringy marketing stunt mentioning her use of she/they pronouns, saying she’s attempting “decolonizing gender.” While that makes no sense whatsoever, she’s clearly trying to tie the colonization of America to some sort of modern identity politics nonsense. With Hollywood going increasingly in crazy directions like this, it causes no surprise to many Americans who have tuned out of films like “Killers of the Flower Moon” as they don’t want politics to interfere with their entertainment.
Lily Gladstone, 37, disclosed that her decision to push she/they pronouns traces back to her childhood experiences on the Blackfeet reservation in Montana, where she observed the alleged misgendering of her boy cousins due to their long hair. This, she asserts, led her to believe that “everybody should just be they” as a more inclusive and neutral approach to gender identification.
RELATED: Top Ten Worst Films of 2023
While it makes no sense as “they” is a plural word, it seems like more of a publicity stunt for woke Hollywood than a real story, as no one was concerned about “misgendering” until a couple of years ago.
The actress, whose heritage spans both Nimiipuu and Blackfeet tribes, claimed there’s an absence of gendered pronouns in most indigenous languages, including those of the Blackfeet community. Instead, gender distinctions are implied through individuals’ names, often challenging the conventional binary concept of gender. However, in English, which is what she probably spoke most of her life in earnest, that’s not the case.
Lily Gladstone’s assertion that her pronoun use is a form of “decolonizing gender” raises eyebrows, particularly among normal movie goers who are sick of virtue signaling and the injection of identity politics into everyday language. Such declarations alienate a broader audience, causing Hollywood to lose touch with its more mainstream supporters.
RELATED: Clownfish TV’s Kneon Reveals Mainstream Media Plot To Push Polyamory On Teen Girls
As Lily Gladstone reflects on her pronoun preferences as a supposed means of embracing her uniqueness in different groups, the overuse of these ridiculous pronouns appears to be more performative activism rather than fostering genuine inclusivity. The criticism extends to the broader discussion of gender-neutral categories in award shows, with Lily Gladstone expressing satisfaction with the current trend of unifying performers under the umbrella term “performer” rather than the traditional actor and actress.
The debate intensifies as Lily Gladstone navigates the awards circuit, being nominated for the Golden Globe and Critics Choice awards. While her performance in “Killers of the Flower Moon” has garnered acclaim, the focus on pronouns and identity politics threatens to overshadow the artistic achievements of the film and its cast.
As Hollywood continues to push the woke agenda even further, the conversation around pronouns and identity politics becomes increasingly prevalent, annoying people more often than not.
Lily Gladstone’s ridiculous proclamation of she/they pronouns, claiming it somehow ties to tribal identity only pushes the woke politics of Hollywood to a point where viewers don’t want to watch anymore. She/they have already alienated enough people with this, as YouTuber HeelsVsBabyface famously mentioned in his “pronouns” rant regarding the Starfield video game which went viral earlier this year.
What do you think of Lily Gladstone’s pronoun nonsense? Is Hollywood in trouble with the Killers of the Flower Moon actress going even crazier? Leave a comment and let us know.
NEXT: Leak Of Marvel’s Echo And Daredevil Fight Scene From Disney+ Show Leaves Fans Shocked And Dismayed
Most Third Worlders would stone that witch to death. And they would be right to do so.
SHE is the colonizer. Gladstone’s woke degeneracy is the new colonialism, far more sinister than any White Imperialism ever was.
You are absolutely correct. The original term from which the English word ‘witch’ was derived meant ‘woman who corrupted women’. It was a poisoner, a liar, who hated men and would turn women into lovers of women, poisoners of their own husbands and children, and otherwise corrupt them into what today would be considered radical feminism, paganism, and man-hatred, but was recognized at the time as insanity and cultural destruction.
‘Do not suffer a witch to live’ was sound advice and still is, because these women are incurably insane, and any attempt to ‘help’ them will simply result in allowing their corruption to spread. They are immune to truth and logic and will fight it with all their souls to try and embrace their ‘personal truth’ instead.
They want to try and improve their own personal status by destroying the lives of women around them, and rule in hell rather than be less than the ultimate height of power in a sane society. And they have utterly destroyed the West.
Her comment is an utter lie. Blackfeet and MOST indigenous tribal languages were almost ENTIRELY gendered. The Blackfoot word for warrior, for example, is EXCLUSIVELY male, as are almost all work-descriptive pronouns, because males had male jobs and females had female jobs. There was a plural form of ‘tribe’ and ‘people’, but those were almost the only gender-neutral words in their languages, and in general, MOST of the North American, South American, and Australian aborigine tribes used words denoting the sex of the group they were describing, or their jobs containing a male or female signifier. “Brave’ (Or rather its linguistic equivalent) meant ‘warrior man’ simply because ‘warrior woman’ was about as meaningful as ‘assault penguin’.
Some ‘rare’ cultures occasionally had exceptions, such as ancient Norse ‘warrior women’ who gave UP their womanhood to become a man in all but a physical sense, but they were generally considered more of a joke than anything else. Bodicea was not a legend, she was a figurehead that wars were fought over.